Don's Past Pick3 Picks
- Tx Lottery -
Comments - E-mail Us - Click here
All of Don's Plays Are For
TXLottery Pick3 Night Draws Only
Updates From Don and Myself Below "Original Play"
Oct. 23, 2002 - From Don - Posted 9:10 PM - Original Play - Cease Playing - To the lottoreport.com: Generally, I do not do this BUT this is such a RARE event I must give players the potential to win 80 to 1 immediately. I am going to list 64 numbers. Play
ONE of the numbers for at least the next 3 days on an ANY type wager.
The numbers are
I have a 29% chance of being correct on one of these numbers arriving immediately. Remember, just play ONE of the numbers. This statistical formation is one of the rarest events I have ever seen in over 8 years. One of the numbers must be played. You won't need any luck here. Don
Oct. 24, 2002 - From Don - Posted 8:50 AM - Cease Play Posted on 10-23-02 -To the lottoreport.com: My apologies to the players for providing a play at such a late hour but this play had to be posted immediately, it was that good. Obviously, as we know now, it arrived. Yes, I did have 64 numbers out of 220 possible. That is a 29% chance of accuracy BUT a 71% chance of failure. That's how tough this game is.
Since I am committed to providing players OPPORTUNITY it would have been a dereliction NOT to have let players know about it.
From Dawn - 10-24-02: Don sent this play to me around 8 pm last night but I was not here. This is indicitive of how Don works. It's not the first time he's sent a play at that hour, however, it is the first time that I posted a last minute play.
I posted it because I wanted you to see how he arrives at his favorites - what he picks from. This is why when we say to "cease play" we mean it. Somehow, he knows that one of those numbers "have" to come in and when it does, then he has to start all over on his figuring because it erased all of the indicators he searches for.
I hope this makes sense to you. I'll admit, it's taken me a long time to come to the realization to "cease play" but I know from experience, its best to stop. It saves you a ton of money!
Don't expect this to happen often because I don't like posting plays at that hour and Don knows it. I believe you need time to think about them and I don't want to encourage players to spend more than you have for a "chance" to win something.
Congratulations to those of you who did win because of this message.
Oct. 10, 2002 - From Don - Posted 9:05 AM - Original Play - Cease Play 10-23-02 - To the readers of lottoreport.com: As I suspected, we didn't have to wait long. One of the converging forces arrived. (See 10-8-02 message for explanation) The correct outcome was 1-7-8.
I had 50 chances to be correct out of 220 outcomes for a 22.7% chance of being correct. And of course, I love being correct because it means loyal readers profit. BUT, I must be right in only ONE day. If you play all 50 for 2 days you will lose unless the double digit occurred. I always take the worst possible scenario for the player and develop it to evaluate if profits can be offered. Although I was correct statistically, it wasn't the absolute best play for readers.
So, this means that numbers with the digits 04, 13, 22 are in focus. On an any ticket, that represents 30 outcomes out of 220 so my percentage of being correct dwindles to 13.6%. Make sure you understand that I have a 86.4% chance of being incorrect. In most things an 86.4% chance is almost a guarantee. If you handicap football or horses and you win 86.4% of the time you are the greatest handicapper of all time. Thats what we face on this particular play, perhaps one of the most specualtive plays I have ever had on this site.
Now that the converging forces have terminated I have to decide what are the absolute best numbers out of the 30 outcomes. This is not an exact play unless you are playing 222 and 999 which I do recommend. The numbers I like are 130, 140, 450, 135, 380, 128, 137. Because my statistics must be altered after every new drawing I might have to change the numbers after more review. So keep reading lottoreport.com and much success. Finally, that 222 really looks primo!!! Thats a 999 to 1 shot. In all, I have 956 chances out of 1000 to be INCORRECT. Don
Oct. 23, 2002 - From Don - Posted 9:00 AM - Cease Play Posted on 10-10-02 - To the lottoreport.com: My sincere apologies in that I gave this play my absolute best effort and had confidence that the indicators would arrive. However, all though there are 220 outcomes and I selected 30 I had theoretically 190 days of margin. The play took 11 days counting the day of arrival. This would seem to be an extraordinary statistical guess based on that but in the pick 3 game it is only marginally successful because in this case it was a double digit which pays 160 to 1 on an any ticket.
Realistically, the play took too long. (11 days to arrive). If you would have played all 30 numbers for 11 days you would have invested 330 to win 160, a horrible disaster. However, if you would have selected one of the 30 at 30 to 1 to win 160 to 1 as we know now, it would have been a great success because seldom in wagering do you get a 30 to 1 wager that pays 160 to 1.
Oct. 21, 2002 - From Don - Posted 11:50 AM - Update to Original Play (10-10) To the lottoreport.com: Since the play began, 12 days ago, the primary indicator, 03, 14, 22 has NOT arrived. I also recommended 2 triple digits, 222 and 999 due to the pattern of statistics presented. During the 12 days, some of the CORRECT outcomes that have occurrred are 635, 863, 683, 997 while I have recommended 999, 380, and 135.
From Dawn - Don actually sent other messages last week but the monitor on my computer broke and I've been working off of a laptop. I did not have my email coming to that computer, therefore, it is my fault that the messages were not posted. Had there been really important changes, I would have posted them. I've also been writing a story that I'm certain will be the solution to our problems. It's coming. I'm almost finished with it!
Oct. 16, 2002 - From Don - Posted 9:35 AM - Update to Original Play (10-10) To the lottoreport.com: The correct outcome for Tuesday 10/15/2002 was 8-6-3. Again, this was NOT one of my recommendations as was 8-0-3. Statistically, I conclude that my recommendations are still valid although we have had 2 of the digits contained in the number for 3 of the recommended days of play. I am slightly leaning towards the 22 selection but not enough to invalidate the 04,13. Yes, 222 still looks prime!! I wish you good luck. Don
Oct. 15, 2002 - From Don - Posted 8:35 AM - Update to Original Play (10-10) To the lottoreport.com: When you play the pick 3 game this long it seems like an eternity to me. Of course, the correct outcome was 5-9-3 and my selection of 1-3-5 was NOT succesful. Even with odds of 86% against me, I still conclude we should continue to play. Keep reading lottoreport.com for great lottery news. Don
Oct. 14, 2002 - From Don - Posted 8:55 AM - Update to Original Play (10-10) To the readers of lottoreport.com: I think our patience will be rewarded on this play. Obviously, it is disconcerting to be playing 1-3-5, one of my recommendations, and to have a correct result of 6-3-5. I am still recommending the same numbers. Thanks for reading lottoreport.com. Don
Oct. 12, 2002 - From Don - Posted 2:15 PM - Update to Original Play (10-10) The correct outcome for 10/11/2002 was NOT in my recommended selections. However, I am continuing to recommend them. Much Success and make sure to read the actual odds of a correct recommendation. Don
Oct. 11, 2002 - From Don - Posted 8:35 AM - Update to Original Play (10-10) - It is not a surprise to me that we did not have success the very first day as what makes this play speculative is the day of occurrence. By that I mean, I am recommending 999. I think it would be somewhat of a shock to everyone if I was correct after 2806 pick 3 draws if 999 occurred. But thats why you get 500 to1 for a dollar wager, they know it can't be done... or can it? I am recommending the same numbers including 222 and 999. Please make sure you read my comments about the odds. I wish everyone good luck. Don
Oct. 8, 2002 - From Don - Posted 10:20 PM - Original Notice of New Play to Come - 2 more messages - both dated Oct 9th - they are below this message - To the lottoreport.com: Let's talk pick 3 numbers and what to watch for beginning Wednesday, October 9, 2002 in the Pick 3 Night Game. In this column, I am going to tell you some current facts about the game and will issue a play in the future depending on how the game develops, what occurs.
Oct. 9, 2002 - From Don - Posted 9:30 AM - To the lottoreport.com: The result for Tuesday, 10/8/2002 in the Pick 3 Night Game was 9-6-4. Obviously, this number does not contain either of the "converging forces."
The longer that numbers occur NOT having one of the converging forces criteria the BETTER it is for us. Actually, I am hoping none of the criteria arrives for 4 more days which will be better for players statistically. I do worry about the triple digit, in this case 2-2-2. These numbers have confounded me since I began looking into statistics involving this game. I have seen this statistical formation before in many other states and it is similar to arrival of the triple- a 999 to 1 shot, basically a shot totally in the dark. So keep reading lottoreport.com for updates and to entertaining news. Don
Oct. 9, 2002 - From Don - Posted 8:40 PM - To the lottoreport.com: While reviewing statistics about the pick 3 game in anticipation of a good opportunity I mentioned the triple digit 222. Many players play triple digits on a daily basis and this often results in a large payout to players when it occurs. In this column, and in relation to what is occurring in the game right now, I want to make some comments about the triple digits.
You would have spent $28,040 in $1 increments. You would have won 43 times for a grand total of $21,500. Thus you would have lost $6540 or 23% of your investment. If you would have read lottoreport a few years ago on January 1st when I picked triple zero you would have won an incredible amount of money in a short time.
Back to Don's 1st page
Don's 21st Prediction
Don's 19th & 20th Predictions & Comments
Just Don's Pick3 Viewpoints
Don's 18th Prediction
Don's 17th Prediction
Don's 16th Prediction
Don's 14th & 15th Predictions
Don's 12th & 13th Predictions
Don's 11th Prediction
Don's 10th Prediction
Don's 8th & 9th Prediction
Don's 5th, 6th, & 7th Predictions
Don's 4th Prediction
Dons's 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Predictions
Comments - E-mail Us - Click here
The Lotto Report
P. O. Box 495033
Garland, Texas 75049-5033
(972) 681-1048 (Fax)